↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the efficacy of targeted spinal cord stimulation (SCS) of the dorsal root ganglion with conventional medical management (CMM) in patients with chronic post-surgical inguinal pain: the…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Comparing the efficacy of targeted spinal cord stimulation (SCS) of the dorsal root ganglion with conventional medical management (CMM) in patients with chronic post-surgical inguinal pain: the SMASHING trial
Published in
BMC Surgery, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12893-018-0349-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederique M. U. Mol, Rudi M. Roumen, Marc R. Scheltinga

Abstract

A significant number of patients who undergo a standard inguinal hernia repair or a Pfannenstiel incision develop chronic (> 3 months) post-surgical inguinal pain (PSIP) due to nerve entrapment. If medication or peripheral nerve blocks fail, surgery including neurectomies may offer relief. However, some patients do not respond to any of the currently available remedial treatment modalities. Targeted spinal cord stimulation (SCS) of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a relatively new type of therapy that has a potential to significantly reduce chronic PSIP. The Axium® SCS System (Spinal Modulation Inc., NY, USA) has been shown to be safe and successful in small cohorts of PSIP patients. Aim of this study is to evaluate targeted spinal cord stimulation therapy in patients with PSIP. A prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial with optional one-way crossover will assess the efficacy of the Axium® SCS system for the treatment of PSIP. Seventy-eight patients with intractable PSIP following open hernia repair or Pfannenstiel incision who did not respond favorably to previous pain treatment regimens including a neurectomy will be randomized to either an Axium® SCS arm or a control arm receiving only conventional medical management (CMM). Primary outcome is the difference in percentage of subjects with ≥50% pain relief after 6 months using a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Data are collected using a daily pain/sleep diary and a number needed to treat (NNT) analysis is performed. Various secondary outcomes will be collected. Targeted SCS stimulation of the DRG using the Axium® SCS system will possibly offer significant pain reduction in patients with PSIP who are refractory to other treatment modalities. The study protocol is registered at the NIH Clinical Trials Registry ( http://clinicaltrials.gov , ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02349659 ) on January 29, 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 37 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,872,724
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#138
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,641
of 330,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.