↓ Skip to main content

How do children with and without ADHD talk about frustration?: Use of a novel emotion narrative recall task

Overview of attention for article published in ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
How do children with and without ADHD talk about frustration?: Use of a novel emotion narrative recall task
Published in
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12402-018-0255-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas D. Fogleman, Kirsten D. Leaberry, Paul J. Rosen, Danielle M. Walerius, Kelly Slaughter

Abstract

Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience difficulties related to emotional reactivity and regulation. The current study examines differences in the emotional reactivity and regulation of children with and without ADHD in the context of their real-life experiences of negative emotion using a novel ecologically valid methodology. Eighty-three 8-12-year-old children (46 ADHD, 38 non-ADHD) participated in the study. Children completed the negative emotion narrative recall task, a novel task whereby children provided a narrative recall of a real-life event where they experienced negative emotion. ANCOVA indicated children with ADHD recalled significantly more overall frustration and intense frustration than children without ADHD. Children with ADHD exhibiting more negative emotional reactivity while recalling negative emotions than children without ADHD. The current study suggests that children with ADHD are uniquely impacted by negative emotional experiences and represents an important step in understanding the emotional reactivity and regulation of children with ADHD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 33%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%