| Title |
TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL−1β modulate hyaluronan synthase expression in human skin fibroblasts: Synergistic effect by concomital treatment with FeSO4 plus ascorbate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11010-006-9230-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe M. Campo, Angela Avenoso, Salvatore Campo, D'Ascola Angela, Alida M. Ferlazzo, Alberto Calatroni |
| Abstract |
Several reports have shown that a number of cytokines such as tumor necrosis-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and interleukin-beta (IL-1beta) are capable to induce hyaluronan sinthases (HASs) mRNA expression in different cell culture types. The obvious consequence of this stimulation is a marked increment in hyaluronan (HA) production. It has been also reported that oxidative stress, by itself, may increase HA levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate how TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma,IL-1beta, and exposition to oxidative stress may modulate HAS activities in normal human skin fibroblasts. Moreover, the effects on HAS mRNA expression of the concomitant treatment with cytokines and oxidants, and the HA concentrations after treatments, were studied. TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and IL-1beta were added to normal or/and exposed to FeSO(4) plus ascorbate fibroblast cultures and HAS1, HAS2 and HAS3 mRNA content, by PCR-real time, was assayed 3,h later. HA levels were also evaluated after 24,h incubation. The treatment of fibroblasts with cytokines up-regulated HASs gene expression and increased HA production. IL-1beta induced HAS mRNA expression and HA production more efficiently than TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. The exposition of the fibroblasts with the oxidant system markedly increased HAS activities while slightly HA production. The concomitant treatment of cells with the cytokines and the oxidant was able to further enhance, in a dose dependent way, with synergistic effect on HAS mRNA expression. On the contrary HA levels resulted unaffected by the concomitant treatment, and resemble those obtained with the exposure to FeSO(4) plus ascorbate only. This lack in HA production could be due to the deleterious action of free radicals on the HA synthesis. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,456,970
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#417
of 2,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,446
of 63,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,304 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.