↓ Skip to main content

Hormesis and paradoxical effects of pea (Pisum sativum L.) parameters upon exposure to formaldehyde in a wide range of doses

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Hormesis and paradoxical effects of pea (Pisum sativum L.) parameters upon exposure to formaldehyde in a wide range of doses
Published in
Ecotoxicology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10646-018-1928-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena A. Erofeeva

Abstract

Formaldehyde is a widespread pollutant of soil near roads including agricultural lands. Non-monotonic changes (hormesis and paradoxical effects) in chlorophyll (Ch) and carotenoid (Car) contents, the lipid peroxidation (LP) rate in plant leaves and growth parameters (GP) of plants can be caused by various pollutants. Hormesis is a biphasic dose-response phenomenon, characterised by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition. The remaining types of non-monotonic responses are classified as paradoxical effects. While most authors who have studied formaldehyde and plants considered gaseous exposure to shoots, the effect of this pollutant in soil solution has been poorly examined. Thus, we studied the non-monotonic changes in Ch and Car contents, LP rate and GP in pea (Pisum sativum L.) upon exposure to formaldehyde in solution, at a wide range of sublethal concentrations from 0.063 × 10-2 to 0.16 g L-1. With formaldehyde exposure, LP and Ch contents had paradoxical effects (triphasic and multiphase changes, accordingly), while Car level did not change and GP exhibited a hormetic response. The date showed that pea parameters display diverse types of non-monotonic responses upon exposure to the same formaldehyde concentrations. High pollutant concentrations (0.08-0.16 g L-1) increased LP and significantly decreased GP (to 2.3-2.5 times compared to the control), while the Ch content was increased. Lower concentrations (<0.08 g L-1) caused a moderate deviation in all parameters from the control (not more than 62%) for hormesis and paradoxical effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Professor 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,235,415
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#83
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,713
of 329,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.