↓ Skip to main content

In-hospital and day-120 survival of critically ill solid cancer patients after discharge of the intensive care units: results of a retrospective multicenter study—A Groupe de recherche respiratoire…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
In-hospital and day-120 survival of critically ill solid cancer patients after discharge of the intensive care units: results of a retrospective multicenter study—A Groupe de recherche respiratoire en réanimation en Onco–Hématologie (Grrr-OH) study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-018-0386-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Vincent, Marcio Soares, Djamel Mokart, Virginie Lemiale, Fabrice Bruneel, Marouane Boubaya, Frédéric Gonzalez, Yves Cohen, Elie Azoulay, Michaël Darmon, on behalf of the GrrrOH: Groupe de recherche respiratoire en réanimation en Onco-Hématologie (Group for respiratory research in intensive care in Onco-Hematology, http://www.grrroh.com/)

Abstract

To assess outcomes at hospital discharge and day-120 after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge among patients with solid cancer admitted to ICU and to identify characteristics associated with in-hospital and day-120 after ICU discharge mortalities. International, multicenter, retrospective study. Five ICUs in France and Brazil, two located in cancer centers, two in university affiliated and one in general hospitals. Consecutive patients aged > 18 years, with underlying solid cancers (known before admission to the ICU or diagnosed during the stay in the ICU), admitted to the participating ICUs and discharged alive from the ICU from January 2006 to December 2011 were included in this study. Patients admitted after scheduled surgery or to secure procedure were excluded. Variables of interest were in-hospital and day-120 post-ICU mortality among patients discharged alive from the ICU. None. A total of 1053 patients aged 63 years (54-71) (median [IQR]) were included. Most of the patients were of the male gender (66.8%). The in-ICU, in-hospital, and four-month post-ICU discharge mortalities were, respectively, 41.3, 60.7, and 65.8%. Among patients discharged alive from the ICU, in multivariate analysis, factors associated with four months post-ICU discharge mortality were type of cancer (OR from 0.25 to 0.52 when compared to lung cancers), systemic extension of the disease (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.87-3.45), need for invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.80-3.59), for vasopressors (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.66-3.29), or renal replacement therapy (OR 1.54; 95% CI 0.99-2.38). A predictive score, "Oncoscore," was built performing fairly in predicting 4 months post-ICU discharge outcome (AUC 0.74; 95% CI 0.71-0.77). Despite the high day-120 mortality following the ICU discharge, our study reports a meaningful medium-term survival rate after the ICU discharge of solid cancer patients. Of utmost importance, the "Oncoscore" must be validated in prospective studies and cannot be used, in its form without external validation, for individual decision making. Prospective studies to answer questions not provided by this study are needed, including only patients with solid cancers admitted in the ICU for medical reasons or after emergency surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Engineering 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,020,439
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#546
of 1,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,833
of 333,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.