You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advanced body composition assessment: from body mass index to body composition profiling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Investigative Medicine, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jim-2018-000722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magnus Borga, Janne West, Jimmy D Bell, Nicholas C Harvey, Thobias Romu, Steven B Heymsfield, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard |
| Abstract |
This paper gives a brief overview of common non-invasive techniques for body composition analysis and a more in-depth review of a body composition assessment method based on fat-referenced quantitative MRI. Earlier published studies of this method are summarized, and a previously unpublished validation study, based on 4753 subjects from the UK Biobank imaging cohort, comparing the quantitative MRI method with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is presented. For whole-body measurements of adipose tissue (AT) or fat and lean tissue (LT), DXA and quantitative MRIs show excellent agreement with linear correlation of 0.99 and 0.97, and coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.5 and 4.6 per cent for fat (computed from AT) and LT, respectively, but the agreement was found significantly lower for visceral adipose tissue, with a CV of >20 per cent. The additional ability of MRI to also measure muscle volumes, muscle AT infiltration and ectopic fat, in combination with rapid scanning protocols and efficient image analysis tools, makes quantitative MRI a powerful tool for advanced body composition assessment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 959 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 959 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 125 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 111 | 12% |
| Researcher | 81 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 13% |
| Unknown | 390 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 195 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 72 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 105 | 11% |
| Unknown | 433 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,192,963
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Medicine
#47
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,782
of 478,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Medicine
#34
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.