↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages, Wound Healing, and Fibrosis: Recent Insights

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Macrophages, Wound Healing, and Fibrosis: Recent Insights
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11926-018-0725-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate S. Smigiel, William C. Parks

Abstract

Macrophages are central players in the immune response following tissue injury. These cells perform many functions, and the changing tissue microenvironment during injury shapes macrophage phenotype down a variety of polarized pathways. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the roles of macrophages during different stages of tissue injury, repair, and-if repair is not achieved-fibrosis. Macrophages present early in inflammation are functionally distinct from those at later stages. The predominant macrophage phenotype must transition from pro-inflammatory to pro-reparative to facilitate wound healing and scar resolution. If macrophages fail to acquire a tissue-healing phenotype, dysregulated signals can be drivers of disease processes, such as sustained, exuberant inflammation-as occurs in arthropathies-and fibrosis. Comprehensive understanding of the roles of specific macrophage populations at different stages of the repair process will support the development of immune-targeted therapies for diseases such as fibrosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,937,475
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#545
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,938
of 359,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.