↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Three Cationic Amino Acid Transporters in Placental Trophoblast: Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of hCAT-1

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Identification of Three Cationic Amino Acid Transporters in Placental Trophoblast: Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of hCAT-1
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, September 1999
DOI 10.1007/s002329900558
Pubmed ID
Authors

S.G. Kamath, T.C. Furesz, B.A. Way, C.H. Smith

Abstract

The concentrative transfer of amino acids from maternal to fetal blood is essential to fetal growth and metabolism. Cationic amino acids are transported across the placental microvillous and basal membranes by multiple pathways which act to mediate maternal/fetal transport. To identify the cationic amino acid transporters of human placenta, total RNA was harvested from cultured trophoblast and from the BeWo choriocarcinoma cell line, b30 clone, and used for reverse transcription (RT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Primers based on published sequences identified expression of mRNAs for hCATs-1, -2B, and -4. RT-PCR yielded a 2.1 kb hCAT-1 cDNA which was cloned. hCAT-1 cRNA injection into Xenopus laevis oocytes stimulated saturable lysine uptake (K(m) approximately 100 microM). In the presence of Na(+), uptake was inhibited by leucine, homoserine, and alanine but not by valine and glutamate. These transport characteristics are comparable to those of system y(+) in placental basal membrane, but differ from those of the same system in microvillous membrane. The identification, cloning, and characterization of multiple human placental cationic amino acid transporters has the potential to facilitate molecular investigation of transport by the maternal- and fetal-facing membranes of placental trophoblast and increase understanding of the mechanism of transplacental amino acid transfer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 46%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 15%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,515,843
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#174
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,528
of 35,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them