↓ Skip to main content

Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and brief pain inventory in patients undergoing re-irradiation for painful bone metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and brief pain inventory in patients undergoing re-irradiation for painful bone metastases
Published in
Quality of Life Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11136-017-1745-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srinivas Raman, Keyue Ding, Edward Chow, Ralph M. Meyer, Yvette M. van der Linden, Daniel Roos, William F. Hartsell, Peter Hoskin, Jackson S. Y. Wu, Abdenour Nabid, Rick Haas, Ruud Wiggenraad, Scott Babington, William F. Demas, Carolyn F. Wilson, Rebecca K. S. Wong, Liting Zhu, Michael Brundage

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#2,282
of 3,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,717
of 449,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#43
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.