| Title |
Mapping the human gene coding for chromosomal protein HMG-17
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, August 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00206764 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Popescu, David Landsman, Michael Bustin |
| Abstract |
The functional gene coding for nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG-17, a nucleosomal binding protein that may confer unique properties to the chromatin structure of active genes, has been mapped to band 1p36.1. The multiple, nonfunctional, HMG-17 retropseudogenes are scattered over several chromosomes. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,344
of 15,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them