↓ Skip to main content

Improving Near‐Real‐Time Coseismic Landslide Models: Lessons Learned from the 2016 Kaikoura, New Zealand, EarthquakeImproving Near‐Real‐Time Coseismic Landslide Models

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Near‐Real‐Time Coseismic Landslide Models: Lessons Learned from the 2016 Kaikoura, New Zealand, EarthquakeImproving Near‐Real‐Time Coseismic Landslide Models
Published in
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 2018
DOI 10.1785/0120170297
Authors

Kate E. Allstadt, Randall W. Jibson, Eric M. Thompson, Chris I. Massey, David J. Wald, Jonathan W. Godt, Francis K. Rengers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 40%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,144,799
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#95
of 1,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,817
of 330,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.