↓ Skip to main content

Lysine Uptake by Cloned hCAT-2B: Comparison with hCAT-1 and with Trophoblast Surface Membranes

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Lysine Uptake by Cloned hCAT-2B: Comparison with hCAT-1 and with Trophoblast Surface Membranes
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, September 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00232-002-1001-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

T.C. Furesz, E. Heath-Monnig, S.G. Kamath, C.H. Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#169
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,845
of 46,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.