↓ Skip to main content

Twenty-year trends in cardiovascular risk among men and women in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,867)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Twenty-year trends in cardiovascular risk among men and women in the United States
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40520-018-0932-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung Ki Kim, Jennifer A. Ailshire, Eileen M. Crimmins

Abstract

Relative to men, women have experienced slower improvement in mortality in the US in recent decades. We investigated 20-year trends in cardiovascular risk for men and women age 40 and over in the US to determine whether there was differential change in risk for men and women. Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we estimated total cardiovascular risk, the prevalence of individual risk factors, and potential factors contributing to change in risk. Men showed steady reductions in cardiovascular risk over the 20 years; women experienced increased risk from 1990 to 2000, but decreased risk from 2000 to 2010. Sex differences in cardiovascular risk changed so that there was no significant difference by sex at any age over 50 in 2010. Large decreases in the prevalence of high risk lipids were important causes of reduction in risks for both sexes; changes in blood pressure were less important, except for women in the 2000-2010 period when they equaled the effect of changing lipids. Increasing medication usage and effectiveness drove improvements in blood pressure and total cholesterol for both sexes. In 2010 there was no difference between men and women in the use of antihypertensives or cholesterol-lowering medications. Metabolic risk, as indexed by obesity and HbA1c, increased over time and went against the trend in the summary measure. Diabetes, smoking, and hormone therapy use did not explain changes in high blood pressure or high total cholesterol for either gender. Recent decreases in cardiovascular risk may lead to future reduction in cardiovascular events and mortality among both women and men.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#536,214
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#25
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,377
of 347,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.