↓ Skip to main content

Towards a Treatment for Intolerance of Uncertainty for Autistic Adults: A Single Case Experimental Design Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Towards a Treatment for Intolerance of Uncertainty for Autistic Adults: A Single Case Experimental Design Study
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3550-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Rodgers, R. Herrema, E. Honey, M. Freeston

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is indicated as an important transdiagnostic process variable in a range of anxiety disorders. Anxiety is very common in autistic adults. This study evaluates a manualised treatment programme for autistic adults, which focused on IU. An eight session programme (CUES-A©) was developed and delivered to four autistic adults on an individual basis. A single case experimental design was used to provide a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the programme. Data regarding retention, acceptability and feasibility indicate that the participants valued the programme. Analyses of outcome measures indicate that the programme has promise as a treatment option for autistic adults experiencing IU.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,600,806
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,491
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,601
of 345,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#39
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.