↓ Skip to main content

A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data

Overview of attention for article published in Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
553 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data
Published in
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.007
Authors

Daniel Coakley, Paul Raftery, Marcus Keane

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 305 25%
Student > Master 210 17%
Researcher 139 12%
Student > Bachelor 79 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 63 5%
Other 142 12%
Unknown 265 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 510 42%
Energy 143 12%
Environmental Science 47 4%
Design 38 3%
Arts and Humanities 17 1%
Other 79 7%
Unknown 369 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
#909
of 5,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,561
of 251,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.