↓ Skip to main content

Julianne Lynch, Julie Rowlands, Trevor Gale, Andrew Skourdoumbis (eds.): Practice theory and education: diffractive readings in professional practice

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Julianne Lynch, Julie Rowlands, Trevor Gale, Andrew Skourdoumbis (eds.): Practice theory and education: diffractive readings in professional practice
Published in
Higher Education, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10734-018-0265-y
Authors

Andrea Detmer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Sports and Recreations 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,811,307
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#613
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,375
of 329,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.