↓ Skip to main content

A novel approach for the analysis of DAZ gene copy number in severely idiopathic infertile men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
A novel approach for the analysis of DAZ gene copy number in severely idiopathic infertile men
Published in
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/bf03343952
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Ferlin, E. Moro, A. Rossi, C. Foresta

Abstract

The deleted-in-azoospermia (DAZ) gene family constitutes the major candidate for the AZFc (azoospermia factor c) phenotype of male infertility, being deleted in about 10% of azoospermic and severely oligozoospermic subjects. Four DAZ genes are arranged in two clusters in AZFc, and standard analysis by PCR cannot distinguish among the different copies. Therefore only deletions of the entire gene cluster can be identified. We developed a PCR amplification-restriction digestion assay able to distinguish from DAZ genes for single nucleotide variants. Then we applied this approach to screen a group of idiopathic infertile men in which the DAZ genes presence was previously assessed by standard PCR analysis. Two patients out of 25 showed deletion of two copies of DAZ (DAZI and 2), suggesting that this mutation was actually the cause of spermatogenic damage. This preliminary screening demonstrates that deletions of copies of DAZ genes may be often found in severely infertile men and it strengthens the role of this gene family in spermatogenesis. Furthermore, this simple method, being able to distinguish among the different DAZ copies, could be used to screen a larger number of patients and to perform a more accurate diagnosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#335
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,459
of 220,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#76
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.