↓ Skip to main content

ELAC2 and prostate cancer risk in Afro-Caribbeans of Tobago

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
ELAC2 and prostate cancer risk in Afro-Caribbeans of Tobago
Published in
Human Genetics, August 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00439-002-0816-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick R. Shea, Robert E. Ferrell, Alan L. Patrick, Lewis H. Kuller, Clareann H. Bunker

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that variation in the putative prostate cancer susceptibility gene ELAC2 contributes to the elevated risk of prostate cancer in Afro-Caribbean males from Tobago, we genotyped the S217L and A514T polymorphisms, previously reported to be associated with prostate cancer risk in a large sample of cases and controls. The frequency of the high-risk Leu allele at the S217L site was the same in cases and controls. Both cases and controls were homozygous for the low-risk Ala allele at the A514T site. In addition, we sequenced the exons and 3'- and 5'-flanking regions of ELAC2 in 24 individuals with histologically confirmed prostate cancer. We identified 17 new single nucleotide polymorphisms. An A(-1196)T polymorphism, which alters a predicted TATA box consensus sequence, was tested in cases and controls, and no significant difference in allele or genotype frequencies was observed. The absence of ELAC2 mutations and lack of association between polymorphisms in ELAC2 and prostate cancer in cases and controls leads us to conclude that ELAC2 does not contribute significantly to the elevated prevalence of prostate cancer in Afro-Caribbean males of Tobago.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 43%
Lecturer 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Psychology 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#515
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,599
of 48,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.