↓ Skip to main content

RPE65 gene: Multiplex PCR and mutation screening in patients from India with retinal degenerative diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetics, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
RPE65 gene: Multiplex PCR and mutation screening in patients from India with retinal degenerative diseases
Published in
Journal of Genetics, April 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02715866
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biju Joseph, Anuradha Srinivasan, Nagasamy Soumittra, Authiappan Vidhya, Nitin Shridhara Shetty, Satagopan Uthra, Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel

Abstract

We used multiplex PCR follwed by sequencing to screen for mutations in the 14 exons of the RPE65 gene in early-childhood-onset autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) and Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA) patients. The RPE65 protein is believed to play an important role in the metabolism of vitamin A in the visual cycle and mutations identified in the gene could have implications for vitamin A-based therapeutic intervention. We were able to identify a homozygous mutation (AAT --> AAG) in exon 9 in an arRP patient and a heterozygous missense transversion (AAT --> AAG) also in exon 9 of an LCA patient. We also identified a polymorphism in exon 10 (GAG --> GAA) in an arRP as well as an LCA patient. Mutation screening would be greatly facilitated by multiplex PCR which could cut down costs, labour and time involved. The nucleotide changes observed in this study could be de novo. Though a larger study has been undertaken, from the preliminary results it appears that in India the RPE65 gene seems to be less involved in causation of LCA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics
#92
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,923
of 121,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them