↓ Skip to main content

Community ecology of the terrestrial small mammals of Zakouma National Park, Chad

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Research, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Community ecology of the terrestrial small mammals of Zakouma National Park, Chad
Published in
Mammal Research, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf03192522
Authors

Laurent Granjon, Céline Houssin, Emilie Lecompte, Maho Angaya, Jean César, Raphaël Cornette, Gauthier Dobigny, Christiane Denys

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 10%
Malaysia 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Peru 1 5%
Unknown 16 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 57%
Environmental Science 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#272
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,035
of 69,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.