↓ Skip to main content

Human Papillomavirus-Related Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Head and Neck

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Human Papillomavirus-Related Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Head and Neck
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12105-018-0886-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

William H. Westra

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck carcinoma (HNC) represents an important subgroup of head and neck cancer that is characterized by a consistent microscopic appearance and a favorable prognosis. A growing experience with HPV testing, however, has uncovered variants that deviate from the prototypic HPV-HNC with respect to morphology. While these HPV-HNCs may deviate morphologically from the prototype, they do not appear to stray far from the favorable clinical outcome assigned to HPV-positive status. In effect, HPV positivity trumps traditional prognostic features predicated on morphology such as tumor grade and histologic subtype when it comes to predicting clinical behavior. For the diagnostic pathologist, the pedestrian task of tumor grading and subtyping would seem to be of little prognostic or therapeutic relevance when it comes to HPV-HNC. Recognition and documentation of neuroendocrine differentiation is a most notable exception. Forms of HPV-HNC have now been reported that morphologically resemble small cell carcinoma (SCC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of other sites, and that immunohistochemically exhibit neuroendocrine differentiation. Despite the presence of HPV, these SCCs and LCNECs share the same aggressive clinical behavior of their counterparts in the lung and other sites where the high grade neuroendocrine phenotype is associated with early distant spread and poor overall survival. Consequently, the high grade neuroendocrine phenotype should be regarded as an aggressive form of HPV-HNC where tumor morphology displaces HPV positivity as the most important prognostic feature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,066,772
of 24,795,084 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#199
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,088
of 337,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,795,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.