↓ Skip to main content

Linkage disequilibrium mapping in the Newfoundland population: a re-evaluation of the refinement of the Bardet–Biedl syndrome 1 critical interval

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Linkage disequilibrium mapping in the Newfoundland population: a re-evaluation of the refinement of the Bardet–Biedl syndrome 1 critical interval
Published in
Human Genetics, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00439-004-1184-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanli Fan, Jane S. Green, Alison J. Ross, Philip L. Beales, Patrick S. Parfrey, William S. Davidson

Abstract

Genetically isolated populations, such as Newfoundland, have contributed greatly to the identification of disease-causing genes. A linkage disequilibrium (LD) study involving six Newfoundland families predicted a critical interval for Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 (BBS1) (Young et al. in Am J Hum Genet 65:1680-1687, 1999), but the subsequent identification of BBS1 revealed that it lies outside this region. This suggested that either there is another gene responsible for BBS in these families or the Newfoundland population may not be ideal for LD studies. We screened these six Newfoundland families for mutations in BBS1 and found that affected individuals in five of them were homozygous for the same M390R mutation. There was no evidence for any BBS1 mutation in the affected individual in the sixth family. Therefore, one of the criteria for LD mapping was not met; namely, there should be a single disease-causing allele in the population. Haplotype analysis of unaffected individuals from south-west Newfoundland and English BBS1 patients homozygous for M390R, revealed that a second criterion for LD mapping was violated. The M390R mutation occurred in a common haplotype and both of these chromosomes, the ancestral wild-type and disease-causing haplotypes, were introduced to Newfoundland and spread by a founder effect. Moreover, it was found that disease-associated alleles occurred at relatively high frequencies in normal haplotypes and this probably accounted for the incorrect prediction in the previous LD study. Knowing the amount of genetic variation and its distribution in the Newfoundland population would be useful to maximize its potential for mapping hereditary disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,187
of 62,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.