↓ Skip to main content

Hlx homeobox transcription factor negatively regulates interferon-γ production in monokine-activated natural killer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hlx homeobox transcription factor negatively regulates interferon-γ production in monokine-activated natural killer cells
Published in
Blood, November 2006
DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-10-050096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Becknell, Tiffany L. Hughes, Aharon G. Freud, Bradley W. Blaser, Jianhua Yu, Rossana Trotta, Hsiaoyin C. Mao, Marie L. Caligiuri de Jesús, Mohamad Alghothani, Don M. Benson, Amy Lehman, David Jarjoura, Danilo Perrotti, Michael D. Bates, Michael A. Caligiuri

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells contribute to host immunity, including tumor surveillance, through the production of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma). Although there is some knowledge about molecular mechanisms that induce IFN-gamma in NK cells, considerably less is known about the mechanisms that reduce its expression. Here, we investigate the role of the Hlx transcription factor in IFN-gamma production by NK cells. Hlx expression is induced in monokine-activated NK cells, but with delayed kinetics compared to IFN-gamma. Ectopic Hlx expression decreases IFN-gamma synthesis in primary human NK cells and IFN-gamma promoter activity in an NK-like cell line. Hlx protein levels inversely correlate with those of STAT4, a requisite factor for optimal IFN-gamma transcription. Mechanistically, we provide evidence indicating that Hlx overexpression accelerates dephosphorylation and proteasome-dependent degradation of the active Y693-phosphorylated form of STAT4. Thus, Hlx expression in activated NK cells temporally controls and limits the monokine-induced production of IFN-gamma, in part through the targeted depletion of STAT4.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Other 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#12,618
of 30,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,800
of 56,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#174
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.