You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of rapid diagnostic tests and choice of antibiotics in respiratory tract infections in primary healthcare—A 6-y follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infectious Diseases, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3109/00365540903352932 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Neumark, Lars Brudin, Sigvard Mölstad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases
#135
of 1,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,262
of 111,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.