| Title |
‘Being with’ or ‘doing for’? How the role of an end-of-life volunteer befriender can impact patient wellbeing: interviews from a multiple qualitative case study (ELSA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-018-4169-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven Dodd, Matt Hill, Nick Ockenden, Guillermo Perez Algorta, Sheila Payne, Nancy Preston, Catherine Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 58% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,772,041
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#222
of 5,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,732
of 344,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#7
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.