↓ Skip to main content

Production of l-valine from metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Production of l-valine from metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-8952-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyuan Wang, Hailing Zhang, Peter J. Quinn

Abstract

L-Valine is one of the three branched-chain amino acids (valine, leucine, and isoleucine) essential for animal health and important in metabolism; therefore, it is widely added in the products of food, medicine, and feed. L-Valine is predominantly produced through microbial fermentation, and the production efficiency largely depends on the quality of microorganisms. In recent years, continuing efforts have been made in revealing the mechanisms and regulation of L-valine biosynthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum, the most utilitarian bacterium for amino acid production. Metabolic engineering based on the metabolic biosynthesis and regulation of L-valine provides an effective alternative to the traditional breeding for strain development. Industrially competitive L-valine-producing C. glutamicum strains have been constructed by genetically defined metabolic engineering. This article reviews the global metabolic and regulatory networks responsible for L-valine biosynthesis, the molecular mechanisms of regulation, and the strategies employed in C. glutamicum strain engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,302,573
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,247
of 8,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,001
of 344,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#31
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.