↓ Skip to main content

FMR1 allele size distribution in 35,000 males and females: a comparison of developmental delay and general population cohorts

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FMR1 allele size distribution in 35,000 males and females: a comparison of developmental delay and general population cohorts
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1038/gim.2018.52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudine M Kraan, Quang M Bui, Mike Field, Alison D Archibald, Sylvia A Metcalfe, Louise M Christie, Bruce H Bennetts, Ralph Oertel, Melanie J Smith, Desiree du Sart, Damien Bruno, Tiffany L Wotton, David J Amor, David Francis, David E Godler

Abstract

PurposeDevelopmental delay phenotypes have been associated with FMR1 premutation (PM: 55-200 CGG repeats) and "gray zone" (GZ: 45-54 CGG repeats) alleles. However, these associations have not been confirmed by larger studies to be useful in pediatric diagnostic or screening settings.MethodsThis study determined the prevalence of PM and GZ alleles in two independent cohorts of 19,076 pediatric referrals to developmental delay diagnostic testing through Victorian Clinical Genetics Service (cohort 1: N = 10,235; cohort 2: N = 8841), compared with two independent general population cohorts (newborn screening N = 1997; carrier screening by the Victorian Clinical Genetics Service prepair program N = 14,249).ResultsPM and GZ prevalence rates were not significantly increased (p > 0.05) in either developmental delay cohort (male PM: 0.12-0.22%; female PM: 0.26-0.33%; male GZ: 0.68-0.69%; female GZ: 1.59-2.13-%) compared with general population cohorts (male PM: 0.20%; female PM: 0.27-0.82%; male GZ: 0.79%; female GZ: 1.43-2.51%). Furthermore, CGG size distributions were comparable across datasets, with each having a modal value of 29 or 30 and ~1/3 females and ~1/5 males having at least one allele with ≤26 CGG repeats.ConclusionThese data do not support the causative link between PM and GZ expansions and developmental-delay phenotypes in pediatric settings.GENETICS in MEDICINE advance online publication, 29 March 2018; doi:10.1038/gim.2018.52.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,050
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,149
of 344,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#49
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.