↓ Skip to main content

Enantiomeric separation of adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline by capillary electrophoresis using streptomycin-modified gold nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Enantiomeric separation of adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline by capillary electrophoresis using streptomycin-modified gold nanoparticles
Published in
Microchimica Acta, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00604-018-2758-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunye Liu, Jingshu Zhang, Xuejiao Zhang, Lingzhi Zhao, Shuang Li

Abstract

Enantiomeric separations of the adrenergic compounds adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline were studied. Electromigrative separations were performed in uncoated fused silica capillaries using streptomycin-modified gold nanoparticles (ST-AuNPs) as an additive to the background electrolyte. The ST-AuNPs are shown to serve as an effective chiral selector. The modified AuNPs were characterized in terms of size and zeta potential, and by IR and UV-vis spectra. The effects of ST-AuNP concentration, pH value, temperature, and separation voltage on the separations were systematically studied. Under optimized experimental conditions, racemic mixtures of the respective adrenergic drugs were baseline-separated within 7 min with a resolution of up to 7.5. The relative standard deviations of the resolution in inter-day and intra-day studies (n = 5) were generally <5%. Graphical abstract Schematic of the method for enantiomeric separations. (A): At low concentrations of streptavidinylated gold nanoparticles (ST-AuNPs), the better matching enantiomer is preferably "transported" by the ST-AuNPs; (B) ST-AuNP concentration increased to an optimal value; (C): The ST-AuNP concentration is too high; even poorly matching enantiomers will be transported simultaneously.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,843,455
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#631
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,631
of 332,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.