| Title |
Mammalian evolution and the interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP) gene: Convincing evidence for several superordinal clades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02337352 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Stanhope, Marta R. Smith, Victor G. Waddell, Calvin A. Porter, Mahmood S. Shivji, Morris Goodman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2009.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#488
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,451
of 29,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.