| Title |
Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Health Sciences Education, March 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1022670432373 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammadreza Hojat, Joseph S. Gonnella, Addeane S. Caelleigh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 127 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 32 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Psychology | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#565
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,204
of 62,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.