↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal score prediction for Alzheimer’s disease based on ensemble correntropy and spatial–temporal constraint

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Longitudinal score prediction for Alzheimer’s disease based on ensemble correntropy and spatial–temporal constraint
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11682-018-9834-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baiying Lei, Wen Hou, Wenbin Zou, Xia Li, Cishen Zhang, Tianfu Wang

Abstract

Neuroimaging data has been widely used to predict clinical scores for automatic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). For accurate clinical score prediction, one of the major challenges is high feature dimension of the imaging data. To address this issue, this paper presents an effective framework using a novel feature selection model via sparse learning. In contrast to previous approaches focusing on a single time point, this framework uses information at multiple time points. Specifically, a regularized correntropy with the spatial-temporal constraint is used to reduce the adverse effect of noise and outliers, and promote consistent and robust selection of features by exploring data characteristics. Furthermore, ensemble learning of support vector regression (SVR) is exploited to accurately predict AD scores based on the selected features. The proposed approach is extensively evaluated on the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) dataset. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach not only achieves promising regression accuracy, but also successfully recognizes disease-related biomarkers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 24 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Psychology 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 29 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,226,337
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#235
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,153
of 330,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.