↓ Skip to main content

Differential Effect of APOE ɛ4 Status and Elevated Pulse Pressure on Functional Decline in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Effect of APOE ɛ4 Status and Elevated Pulse Pressure on Functional Decline in Cognitively Normal Older Adults
Published in
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, January 2018
DOI 10.3233/jad-170918
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeleine L. Werhane, Kelsey R. Thomas, Emily C. Edmonds, Katherine J. Bangen, My Tran, Alexandra L. Clark, Daniel A. Nation, Paul E. Gilbert, Mark W. Bondi, Lisa Delano-Wood, and for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

The APOE ɛ4 allele and increased vascular risk have both been independently linked to cognitive impairment and dementia. Since few studies have characterized how these risk factors affect everyday functioning, we investigated the relationship between APOE ɛ4 genotype and elevated pulse pressure (PP) on functional change in cognitively normal participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). 738 normally aging participants underwent APOE genotyping, and baseline PP was calculated from blood pressure indices. The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) was completed by participants' informant at baseline and 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48-month follow-up visits. Multiple linear regression and multilevel modeling were used to examine the effects of PP and APOE ɛ4 genotype on cross-sectional and longitudinal FAQ scores, respectively. Adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, results showed that both APOE ɛ4 status and elevated PP predicted greater functional difficulty trajectories across four years of follow-up. Interestingly, however, elevated PP was associated with greater functional decline over time in ɛ4 non-carriers versus carriers. Results show that, although APOE ɛ4 status is the prominent predictor of functional difficulty for ɛ4 carriers, an effect of arterial stiffening on functional difficulty was observed in non-carriers. Future studies are needed in order to clarify the etiology of the association between PP and different brain aging processes, and further explore its utility as a marker of dementia risk. The present study underscores the importance of targeting modifiable risk factors such as elevated PP to prevent or slow functional decline and pathological brain aging.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 20%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 24 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
#3,437
of 7,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,505
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
#253
of 543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.