↓ Skip to main content

Identification of a VPS13A founder mutation in French Canadian families with chorea-acanthocytosis

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Identification of a VPS13A founder mutation in French Canadian families with chorea-acanthocytosis
Published in
neurogenetics, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10048-005-0220-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Dobson-Stone, Antonio Velayos-Baeza, An Jansen, Frederick Andermann, François Dubeau, Francine Robert, Anne Summers, Anthony E. Lang, Sylvain Chouinard, Adrian Danek, Eva Andermann, Anthony P. Monaco

Abstract

Mutations in VPS13A cause chorea-acanthocytosis (ChAc), an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder. VPS13A is located in a tail-to-tail arrangement with GNA14 on chromosome 9q21. ChAc shows substantial allelic heterogeneity, with no single VPS13A mutation causing the majority of cases. We examined 11 patients in four French Canadian ChAc pedigrees for mutations in VPS13A. Affected members of three families were homozygous for a 37-kb deletion of the four terminal exons of VPS13A (EX70_EX73del). This deletion also encompasses the two terminal exons of GNA14. Two affected females in family 4 were homozygous for the splicing mutation 4242+1G>T. Remarkably, the affected males in this highly consanguineous pedigree were compound heterozygotes for EX70_EX73del and 4242+1G>T. PCR analysis of the deletion breakpoint junction revealed that an additional patient with French Canadian ancestry was heterozygous for the EX70_EX73del allele. The identification of a common 9q21 haplotype associated with EX70_EX73del in at least four apparently unrelated ChAc families implies that ChAc shows a founder effect in French Canadians, and that routine testing for EX70_EX73del in suspected ChAc cases may therefore be worthwhile in this population. The deletion breakpoint PCR described here will enable rapid identification of both homozygous and heterozygous carriers of EX70_EX73del.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Neuroscience 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#116
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,344
of 57,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.