↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing the Impact of Compliance with National Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer Care Using the National Cancer Database

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Analyzing the Impact of Compliance with National Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer Care Using the National Cancer Database
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11605-018-3742-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Jaap, Marcus Fluck, Marie Hunsinger, Jeffrey Wild, Tania Arora, Mohsen Shabahang, Joseph Blansfield

Abstract

Management of pancreatic cancer is complex, requiring coordination of multiple providers. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, developed for standardization and quality improvement, recommend a multimodal approach. This study analyzed national rates of compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations, assessed factors affecting compliance, and evaluated whether compliance with evidence-based guidelines improved overall survival. This is a retrospective review of adults diagnosed with pancreatic cancer entered into the National Cancer Database. Patients included had stage I and II pancreatic cancer, and complete data in the database. Patients were classified as compliant if they underwent both surgery and a second treatment modality (chemotherapy, radiation, or chemoradiation). Clinico-pathologic variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate models to predict overall survival. Hospital-based national study population. Patients with stage I or II pancreatic cancer. Compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations, factors affecting compliance, and overall survival based on compliance. A total of 52,450 patients were included; 19,272 patients (37%) were compliant. Patients were found to be most compliant in the 50-59-year-old range (49% complaint), with decreased compliance at the extremes of age. Male patients were more compliant than female patients (39 vs 34%, p < 0.0001). Caucasians were more compliant (39%) than African Americans (32%) or other races (32%, p < 0.0001). Patients treated at academic/research centers were more compliant than patients treated at other facilities (39% compliant, p < 0.0001). Patients with stage II disease were more compliant compared with stage I disease (43 vs 18%, p < 0.0001). Compliance was shown to improve overall survival (p < 0.0001). Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for pancreatic cancer patients improves survival. Compliance nationwide is low, especially for older patients and minorities and those treated outside academic centers. More studies will need to be performed to identify factors that hinder compliance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,322,779
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1,430
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,163
of 345,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.