↓ Skip to main content

The prognostic implications of primary tumor location on recurrence in early-stage colorectal cancer with no associated risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The prognostic implications of primary tumor location on recurrence in early-stage colorectal cancer with no associated risk factors
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00384-018-3031-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung Il Kang, Duck-Woo Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Hye-Seung Lee, Min Hyun Kim, Myung Jo Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Sung-Bum Kang

Abstract

Recently, several reports have suggested that tumor location serves as a prognostic biomarker in advanced colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic implication of tumor location in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer remains unclear. This study was aimed to examine the prognostic implication of tumor location in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. Patients with stage I and low-risk stage II colorectal cancer, treated with radical surgery in a hospital setting between May 2003 and September 2014, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and whose microsatellite instability (MSI) status was lacked were excluded. Distal colon cancer was defined as tumors located from the splenic flexure colon to the sigmoid colon. A total of 712 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 23 (3.2%) had a recurrence at a median follow-up time of 46 months. The tumor recurrence rate was significantly low in patients with proximal colon cancer. In the multivariate analysis, tumors located in the distal colon or rectum (distal colon, hazard ratio [HR] 9.213, P = 0.035; rectum, HR 15.366, P = 0.009) and T3 tumors (HR 4.590, P = 0.017) were related to tumor recurrence. A higher prevalence of tumor recurrence was found in patients with two recurrence factors than those who had only one factor or none (P < 0.001). Tumor location, as well as T stage, had prognostic implication in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. Validation of our results is needed in a large cohort with genetic characterization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#13,586,133
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#886
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,756
of 329,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.