| Title |
Zur Geschichte des Vorhofflimmerns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-003-0889-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamás Fazekas, Gizella Liszkai, Helga Bielik, Berndt Lüderitz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#415
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,233
of 140,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them