↓ Skip to main content

Elevated plasma levels of human urotensin-II immunoreactivity in congestive heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated plasma levels of human urotensin-II immunoreactivity in congestive heart failure
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, June 2003
DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00217.2003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fraser D. Russell, Deborah Meyers, Andrew J. Galbraith, Nick Bett, Istvan Toth, Philip Kearns, Peter Molenaar

Abstract

Human urotensin-II (hU-II) is the most potent endogenous cardiostimulant identified to date. We therefore determined whether hU-II has a possible pathological role by investigating its levels in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Blood samples were obtained from the aortic root, femoral artery, femoral vein, and pulmonary artery from CHF patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and the aortic root from patients undergoing investigative angiography for chest pain who were not in heart failure. Immunoreactive hU-II (hU-II-ir) levels were determined with radioimmunoassay. hU-II-ir was elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients (230.9 +/- 68.7 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.001) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts (22.7 +/- 6.1 pg/ml, n = 18). This increase was attributed to cardiopulmonary production of hU-II-ir because levels were lower in the pulmonary artery (38.2 +/- 6.1 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.001) than in the aortic root. hU-II-ir was elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (142.1 +/- 51.5 pg/ml, n = 10; P < 0.05) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts without coronary artery disease (27.3 +/- 12.4 pg/ml, n = 7) and CHF patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (311.6 +/- 120.4 pg/ml, n = 11; P < 0.001) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts and coronary artery disease (19.8 +/- 6.6 pg/ml, n = 11). hU-II-ir was significantly higher in the aortic root than in the pulmonary artery and femoral vein, with a nonsignificant trend for higher levels in the aortic root than in the femoral artery. The findings indicated that hU-II-ir is elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients and that hU-II-ir is cleared at least in part from the microcirculation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Italy 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Professor 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#1,509
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,537
of 53,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.