You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expression and characterisation of recombinant human CD48 and isolation of a human anti‐CD48 monoclonal antibody by phage display
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jctb.1238 |
| Authors |
Jiewei Wei, David Y Chin, Dallia Catzel, Natasha Pera, Stephen M Mahler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 67% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
#59
of 1,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,633
of 76,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,542 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them