| Title |
Measuring Sedentary Behavior During Pregnancy: Comparison Between Self-reported and Objective Measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maternal and Child Health Journal, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10995-018-2473-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel Ángel Oviedo-Caro, Javier Bueno-Antequera, Diego Munguía-Izquierdo |
| Abstract |
Objectives To quantify and compare the sedentary time estimated by the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the sedentary time objectively measured by a multi-sensor monitor (SWA) in pregnant women. Methods One hundred eighty-six participants answered the SBQ and wore the SWA at least 7 valid days. The concordance, correlation, agreement and relative activity levels between both measures of sedentary time were examined. Differences of sedentary time between weekday and weekend and between groups stratified by sociodemographic and clinical characteristic were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. Results Pregnant women were sedentary the 64% of their waking hours. Television viewing is the most prevalent sedentary behavior. The concordance, correlation, and agreement between SBQ and SWA were weak, yet a significant correlation in weekday and average day sedentary time (r = 0.23 and 0.20, P = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) was observed. A significant linear trend was found for increasing sedentary time between both methods using a relative activity levels analysis. Conclusions for Practice Pregnant women experience high amount of sedentary time, for approximately half of the day. The SBQ shows a low validity and agreement, but strong ability to rank individuals compared with SWA in pregnant women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| Kenya | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 27% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,796,069
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#482
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,328
of 448,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#18
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.