↓ Skip to main content

Macrophages in the interstitial tissue of the rat testis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, February 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Macrophages in the interstitial tissue of the rat testis
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, February 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00251049
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Niemi, R. M. Sharpe, W. R. A. Brown

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2007.
All research outputs
#8,517,130
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#543
of 2,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,083
of 42,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them