↓ Skip to main content

A computational model for genetic and epigenetic signals in colon cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 294)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
A computational model for genetic and epigenetic signals in colon cancer
Published in
Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12539-013-0172-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irina Afrodita Roznovăţ, Heather J. Ruskin

Abstract

Cancer, a class of diseases, characterized by abnormal cell growth, has one of the highest overall death rates world-wide. Its development has been linked to aberrant genetic and epigenetic events, affecting the regulation of key genes that control cellular mechanisms. However, a major issue in cancer research is the lack of precise information on tumour pathways; therefore, the delineation of these and of the processes underlying disease proliferation is an important area of investigation. A computational approach to modelling malignant system events can help to improve understanding likely "triggers", i.e. initiating abnormal micro-molecular signals that occur during cancer development. Here, we introduce a network-based model for genetic and epigenetic events observed at different stages of colon cancer, with a focus on the gene relationships and tumour pathways. Additionally, we describe a case study on tumour progression recorded for two gene networks on colon cancer, carcinoma in situ. Our results to date showed that tumour progression rate is higher for a small, closely-associated network of genes than for a larger, less-connected set; thus, disease development depends on assessment of network properties. The current work aims to provide improved insight on the way in which aberrant modifications characterize cancer initiation and progression. The framework dynamics are described in terms of interdependencies between three main layers: genetic and epigenetic events, gene relationships and cancer stage levels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Computer Science 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Mathematics 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#40
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,291
of 307,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them