| Title |
Effect of a 24-h extended visiting policy on delirium in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5153-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Mayara Schirmer Moerschberger, Dailany D’Aroz Vollmann, Amanda Caroline Inácio, Míriam C. Machado, Geonice Sperotto, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Álvaro Koenig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 269 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 69 | 26% |
| United States | 37 | 14% |
| Spain | 11 | 4% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Italy | 7 | 3% |
| Argentina | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 94 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 62 | 23% |
| Scientists | 41 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 31% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#234,157
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#179
of 5,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,325
of 344,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.