| Title |
New toxodontid (Notoungulata) from the Early Miocene of Mendoza, Argentina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PalZ, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12542-014-0233-5 |
| Authors |
Analía M. Forasiepi, Esperanza Cerdeño, Mariano Bond, Gabriela I. Schmidt, Maximiliano Naipauer, Fiona R. Straehl, Agustín G. Martinelli, Alberto C. Garrido, Mark D. Schmitz, James L. Crowley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Panama | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,004,894
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#95
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,303
of 231,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them