↓ Skip to main content

Modification of primers for GRHPR genotyping: avoiding allele dropout by single nucleotide polymorphisms and homology sequence

Overview of attention for article published in Urolithiasis, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Modification of primers for GRHPR genotyping: avoiding allele dropout by single nucleotide polymorphisms and homology sequence
Published in
Urolithiasis, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00240-008-0159-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naohisa Takaoka, Tatsuya Takayama, Miki Miyazaki, Masao Nagata, Seiichiro Ozono

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Urolithiasis
#230
of 716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,419
of 105,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urolithiasis
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.