↓ Skip to main content

Paradoxic inhibition of human natural interferon-producing cells by the activating receptor NKp44

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paradoxic inhibition of human natural interferon-producing cells by the activating receptor NKp44
Published in
Blood, June 2005
DOI 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Fuchs, Marina Cella, Takayuki Kondo, Marco Colonna

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity is triggered by multiple activating receptors associated with the signaling adaptor protein DNAX activation protein 12/killer cell-activating receptor-associated protein (DAP12/KARAP). Here, we show that one of these receptors, NKp44, is present on a subset of natural interferon-producing cells (IPCs) in tonsils. NKp44 expression can also be induced on blood IPCs after in vitro culture with interleukin 3 (IL-3). Crosslinking of NKp44 does not trigger IPC-mediated cytotoxicity but, paradoxically, inhibits interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) production by IPCs in response to cytosine-phosphate-guanosine (CpG) oligonucleotides. We find that IPCs in tonsils are in close contact with CD8+ T cells and demonstrate that a subset of memory CD8+ T cells produces IL-3. Therefore, IL-3-mediated induction of NKp44 on IPCs may be an important component of the ongoing crosstalk between the innate and adaptive immune response that allows memory CD8+ T cells to control the IPC response to virus.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Colombia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#4,890
of 33,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,491
of 67,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#29
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.