| Title |
Variables affecting the risk of pneumothorax and intrapulmonal hemorrhage in CT-guided transthoracic biopsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-008-0893-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. F. Khan, R. Straub, S. R. Moghaddam, A. Maataoui, J. Gurung, T. O. F. Wagner, H. Ackermann, A. Thalhammer, T. J. Vogl, V. Jacobi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 74% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,153
of 4,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,815
of 82,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.