| Title |
Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain)1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5 |
| Authors |
Javier Tardío, Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 508 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 13% |
| Researcher | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 94 | 18% |
| Unknown | 163 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 177 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 67 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Unknown | 179 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#315
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,796
of 90,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.