| Title |
The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, January 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02862204 |
| Authors |
Oliver Phillips, Alwyn H. Gentry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 54 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,164
of 65,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.