↓ Skip to main content

Artisanal fishers’ ethnobotany: from plant diversity use to agrobiodiversity management

Overview of attention for article published in Environment, Development and Sustainability, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Artisanal fishers’ ethnobotany: from plant diversity use to agrobiodiversity management
Published in
Environment, Development and Sustainability, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10668-008-9151-6
Authors

Nivaldo Peroni, Alpina Begossi, Natalia Hanazaki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 9%
Indonesia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 41%
Environmental Science 23 25%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#519
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,891
of 79,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.