You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional annotation of a full-length mouse cDNA collection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1038/35055500 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Kawai, A. Shinagawa, K. Shibata, M. Yoshino, M. Itoh, Y. Ishii, T. Arakawa, A. Hara, Y. Fukunishi, H. Konno, J. Adachi, S. Fukuda, K. Aizawa, M. Izawa, K. Nishi, H. Kiyosawa, S. Kondo, I. Yamanaka, T. Saito, Y. Okazaki, T. Gojobori, H. Bono, T. Kasukawa, R. Saito, K. Kadota, H. Matsuda, M. Ashburner, S. Batalov, T. Casavant, W. Fleischmann, T. Gaasterland, C. Gissi, B. King, H. Kochiwa, P. Kuehl, S. Lewis, Y. Matsuo, I. Nikaido, G. Pesole, J. Quackenbush, L. M. Schriml, F. Staubli, R. Suzuki, M. Tomita, L. Wagner, T. Washio, K. Sakai, T. Okido, M. Furuno, H. Aono, R. Baldarelli, G. Barsh, J. Blake, D. Boffelli, N. Bojunga, P. Carninci, M. F. de Bonaldo, M. J. Brownstein, C. Bult, C. Fletcher, M. Fujita, M. Gariboldi, S. Gustincich, D. Hill, M. Hofmann, D. A. Hume, M. Kamiya, N. H. Lee, P. Lyons, L. Marchionni, J. Mashima, J. Mazzarelli, P. Mombaerts, P. Nordone, B. Ring, M. Ringwald, I. Rodriguez, N. Sakamoto, H. Sasaki, K. Sato, C. Schönbach, T. Seya, Y. Shibata, K.-F. Storch, H. Suzuki, K. Toyo-oka, K. H. Wang, C. Weitz, C. Whittaker, L. Wilming, A. Wynshaw-Boris, K. Yoshida, Y. Hasegawa, H. Kawaji, S. Kohtsuki, Y. Hayashizaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Professor | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 148 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,869,470
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#48,975
of 97,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,643
of 113,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#101
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.